Termination w.r.t. Q proof of /home/nowonder/forschung/aprove/satrung/aprove/lpar3/SK90SLASH2.56.trs

Termination w.r.t. Q of the following Term Rewriting System could be proven:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

f₂(a, x) -> g₂(a, x)
g₂(a, x) -> f₂(b, x)
f₂(a, x) -> f₂(b, x)

Q is empty.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

f₂(a, x) -> g₂(a, x)
g₂(a, x) -> f₂(b, x)
f₂(a, x) -> f₂(b, x)

Q is empty.

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

F₂(a, x) -> F₂(b, x)
F₂(a, x) -> G₂(a, x)
G₂(a, x) -> F₂(b, x)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

f₂(a, x) -> g₂(a, x)
g₂(a, x) -> f₂(b, x)
f₂(a, x) -> f₂(b, x)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

F₂(a, x) -> F₂(b, x)
F₂(a, x) -> G₂(a, x)
G₂(a, x) -> F₂(b, x)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

f₂(a, x) -> g₂(a, x)
g₂(a, x) -> f₂(b, x)
f₂(a, x) -> f₂(b, x)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph contains 0 SCCs with 3 less nodes.